Tag Archives: Gov. Jay Inslee

Liberal logic: Muscle supplements bad for kids, puberty blockers for “gender-affirming” care good

Democrats can’t stay in one lane.

One one hand, they insist that minor children are competent to decide to change their gender and take life- and body-altering drugs to achieve that goal.

On the other hand, minors aren’t smart enough to understand the consequences of diet pills and muscle-building supplements that can pose health risks.

At least we can count on democrats to be inconsistent with their logic.

In January, President Trump signed an executive order to restrict access (including federal funding) to “gender-affirming” care for minor children. Washington state’s attorney general, Nick Brown, immediately challenged this executive order in court and was granted a temporary restraining order. Brown said at the time that President Trump’s actions are harming Washington’s youth, parents and health care providers.

Washing state also goes as far as protecting transgender minors who are estranged from their parents, giving them protection to seek “gender-affirming” care without parental intervention.

Apparently muscle-building supplements and diet pills are a problem for minors because now the democrats have decided they must take action to address the harm that comes from them to Washington state’s youth.

Washington state democrats have introduced Senate Bill 5622  that will ban the sale of over-the-counter diet pills and muscle-building supplements to those under 18. From Mynorthwest.com:

“Senate Bill 5622 would make it illegal for retailers to sell, give away, or ship weight loss and muscle-building supplements to minors. Stores would be required to check IDs before selling these products, and online retailers would need to verify that an adult signs for the delivery.

The bill specifically targets diet pills and supplements labeled or marketed for weight loss or muscle growth, except for general protein powders and drinks unless they contain additional ingredients linked to these effects

Supporters of the bill argue that many diet and muscle-building supplements contain stimulants and other ingredients that can pose health risks to young users. Some studies have linked their use to heart problems, liver damage, and unhealthy weight-control behaviors.

“The supplement industry is largely unregulated, and minors are being bombarded with ads that make these products seem harmless,” said Senator John Lovick (D-Mill Creek) during the public hearing. “Children are being intentionally targeted by companies that claim to promote wellness while advertising and selling dangerous and untested products.”

Read the whole story here.

You know what is harmful to minors? Puberty blockers (mostly GnRH analogues) which delay and alter the natural process of puberty. GnRH analogues stop the body from making sex hormones, including testosterone and estrogen. According to advocates who support pubertly blockers for minors, a child will resume puberty once they stop taking the medication.

Yet there have been many studies that dispute this claim. A long-term study in the UK found that the majority of children who take them do not resume puberty. Some major consequences to taking puberty blockers include decreased bone density and a flatlining of normal growth as well as many other side effects.

I understand that there may be dangers with diet pills and muscle-building supplements for minors. Good to address that before they cause any long-term, body-altering damage.

I also understand that there are irreparable damages associated with puberty blockers. Why can’t democrats apply the logic of muscle-building supplements and diets pills posing health risks to young users the same way to puberty blockers?

Because with progressives, a narrative must not be destroyed. They are too invested in the transgender movement to apply their logic consistently.

DCG

 

WA State wants to punish gun owners who have firearms stolen

When Seattle was safe…

I grew up in Washington State and moved to a red state over a decade ago.

The most populas county (King, where I grew up) was a decent and safe place growing up. As teens we would go downtown to the Seattle Center and run around by ourselves (go on the rides, monorail, etc.) with no incidents.

Fast forward after decades of democrat control and Washington state (and their most populas counties) are no longer safe.

Last September, a 2023 FBI crime data report showed that for the last five consecutive years when comparing Washington state to the national average, murders are 408% higher, vehicle thefts higher by 144%, and burglaries, robberies, and aggravated assaults are all higher since 2019.

Governor Jay Inslee (first elected in 2013, out of office as of this month) enacted some of the strictest gun control laws during his tenure in Washington state.

But for democrat gun grabbers, it is never enough. Now the demorats in the state legisltature are proposing even stricter gun storage laws and if your firearm is stolen because you didnt store it according to their mandate, one could face very stiff penalties.

From MyNorthwest:

“A new bill aimed at curbing rising gun thefts throughout the state has been drawn up for lawmakers to mull and debate in the Washington Legislature.

House Bill 1152 proposes specific requirements for storing a legally owned firearm for gun owners (they would have to store their firearms in a hard case or lock the trigger in a soft case) and significant penalties if the gun is stolen. The owner of a gun that becomes stolen could face a $1,000 fine, and if the thief who stole the firearm is someone who legally cannot own a gun and commits a violent crime with said gun, the gun owner could be charged with a separate felony.

“For example, in your vehicle, if you have to have the pistol, it has to be stored and unloaded in a container that’s opaque, locked, hard-sided and fixed to the vehicle. It has to be concealed and your vehicle has to be locked. If it’s a rifle or a shotgun, it needs to be stored in a soft-sided case and have a trigger lock,” Andrew Lanier, producer of “The Gee and Ursula Show,” said on the show. “Now, if that gun is stolen, you can be liable for a fine of up to $1,000 if it is not secured. If someone steals that gun, it is a misdemeanor.

“If someone who’s not allowed to own a gun, say, a felon or a minor, steals it and gets possession, it is a gross misdemeanor,” Lanier continued in his explanation of the proposed bill. “If someone not allowed to have a gun gets your gun and commits a crime with it, say, for example, someone holds up to 7-Eleven, now it becomes a felony if your stolen gun that was unsecured was used in a crime that hurts someone else. And I need to point out a Class C felony is up to five years in prison and a $10,000 fine. I don’t think you would get that much, but it would also mean that you’re a felon and no longer allowed to own a gun.”

Read the whole article here.

Democrats have been doing their best to implement “backdoor” laws that limit gun ownership. They will do everything they can to punish legal gun owners in hopes of eliminating the Second Amendment.

Loved ‘ya growing up, Washington. Sad to say I will never move back to that once beautiful state.

I will stay put in my red state of Oklahoma. Our residents and politicians would never tolerate such an infringement upon our Second Amendment right. Which is just how I like it. Course the only drawback to living in Oklahoma is dealing with this:

DCG